Contents
It’s well known that the meaning of heritage is hardly
attributable to a simple and unambiguous definition. With all its multiple
meanings the term heritage still refers to what concerns the past and what we
inherit from it, being it material or immaterial (Herbert 1995, Timothy and Boyd
2003). A broad and inclusive definition to which others could be associated
defines heritage as "what contemporary society chooses to inherit and pass
on" (Ashworth and Tunbridge 1996) or as "any kind of exchange or inter-relation"
(Graham 2000). Some authors tend to define heritage as sense of past,
meaning by that the awareness that a community has of its own past, or the
ability to identify human signs in landscape giving them a historical
perspective (Walsh 1992). Starting from this recognition, the awareness of
preserving and enhancing those signs, generating what is called sense of
place, may be developed. Therefore, for our purpose, heritage can be
understood both as sense of past and sense of place. For those
who deal with architecture, the recognition of the sense of past and sense
of place lies also in the ability to read/interpret/enhance the relations
of belonging of a specific asset, or system of assets, to a specific
environment.
The assets and relations with the contexts in which they are located
should be clearly preserved to convey them to future generations, but, at the
same time, they should be used, or better, lived in the present. The issue of
preservation in architectural design is hence inevitably intertwined with the
complex topic of use and heritage enhancement, both in relation to the life of residents
and the presence of visitors from other places, countries, or continents. There
is a wide literature on the tourist phenomenon, its economic impact and the
social advantages and disadvantages that it can provide to a given territory.
The presence of tourism in areas characterised by the presence of heritage
assets can be interpreted in two opposite ways: as a factor contributing to the
heritage conservation and enhancement or, by contrast, as a factor capable to
introduce elements of degradation or disturbance to its fruition. Even with
respect to the dual connotation that tourism can assume, the schools of
architecture should start to test design approaches that are appropriate to the
specific nature of a theme which requires the ability to: dialogue with other
disciplines, from transport engineering to tourism economy; interact with
multiple figures, from conservation institutions to tour operators; respond to
the different and often conflicting needs expressed by citizens and tourists.